Understand the site, review the evidence behind each assessment.
cEMS · Intelligent Integrated Monitoring with VLM/LLM
Site and device management, video and events, faults and maintenance, and operational statistics. A proposed integrated configuration adds VLM situation analysis and LLM evidence review to existing cEMS workflows.
Within existing monitoring workflows, add situation understanding and evidence review.
Site statusOperations interface guide
01 / 04
Check site and device status.
Find the target site on the map and review normal or fault status and device information.
Items to review
Site list · Device status · Counts by status
Proposed VLM/LLM integration
The proposed analysis uses site and device locations, communications status and reception times as context. Current status is distinguished from historical video.
Event reviewOperations interface guide
02 / 04
See what happened and where.
Review event locations alongside site video to find the information needed to understand the situation.
Items to review
Event list · Locations · Site video
Proposed VLM/LLM integration
The proposed workflow continues within the selected event with context-aware VLM reanalysis and LLM evidence comparison, presenting both observations and items still to be verified.
Fault managementOperations interface guide
03 / 04
Connect records from occurrence to action.
Review fault details, occurrence times, locations and action records together.
Items to review
Fault list · Occurrence times · Action records
Proposed VLM/LLM integration
The proposed configuration uses an LLM to retrieve fault records and relevant manuals, and presents inspection procedures with sources. Operator checks and actions are linked to existing records.
StatisticsOperations interface guide
04 / 04
Compare operational records.
Review device and service operational statistics to identify changes in site status and records.
Items to review
Operational statistics · Service records · Site comparisons
Proposed VLM/LLM integration
The proposed configuration adds event-specific analysis, reviews and actions to existing operational statistics. AI suggestions are distinguished from operator-confirmed results.
This guide presents existing cEMS interfaces alongside the proposed VLM/LLM integration. The figures shown are not live operational data; integrated functions and data scope are finalized according to implementation requirements.
02 / CONTEXT TO EVIDENCE
From what is visible, to the evidence behind the explanation.
The proposed configuration distinguishes facts visible in video from information needed for interpretation, presenting context-aware analysis and its evidence within the same event interface.
Context-aware VLM/LLM analysis interfaceExample interface · Simulated data
01
Review original material and site information
The proposed analysis connects video, signals, surrounding conditions and device status for the site, device or event selected in cEMS. Information is matched to the event time and target.
02
Reanalyse the situation with a VLM
Add available information to initial observations to refine the explanation. Present what remains unchanged, what changes and what needs further checking.
03
Compare evidence with an LLM
Compare records linked to key explanations and check the material’s time, lane and target conditions. Distinguish consistent, conflicting and insufficient evidence.
04
Review results and review history
The proposed configuration presents the final analysis, evidence used, unverified items and operator comments within existing event and action records, linking review results to fault, maintenance and statistics workflows.
Distinguish facts verified in the supplied material from assessments that need additional evidence. AI review results and operator verification status are shown separately.
03 / OPERATION SCENARIOS
For questions from the field, add evidence to review.
The proposed features support context-aware analysis and follow-up checks for traffic-safety events and device operations.
01
Stopped vehicles at intersections
Review signals and queues for the same time and lane. Distinguish interpretations consistent with waiting at a signal from items needing further material, such as whether the stop continued.
Video · Signal records · Before-and-after observations
02
Pedestrians at night or in rain
Check occlusion, road-surface reflections, image clarity and environmental information. Separate visible observations from assessments requiring additional evidence, such as travel direction or a signal violation.
Image quality · Environment · Observation scope
03
Interrupted device reception
Check the latest reception time and fault records, and present inspection procedures from relevant manuals. Distinguish historical video from current status to support site checks.
Reception history · Device status · Operational knowledge
This is a proposed VLM/LLM feature configuration with example interfaces using simulated data. Applicable functions and information are finalized according to site devices, available data and implementation requirements.
CAPABILITIES
Key functions and application scope.
01
Site status monitoring
Review communications status and operating information for each intersection and device
02
Event and record management
Integrate detected events, alerts, faults and action records
03
Operational analysis
Compare information by section and review maintenance priorities
CONFIGURATION
Configuration and integration.
Offering type and stage
Software · Site operations management · Operational software
Site overview
Review site lists, camera status and collection status
Video and events
Review site video, detection areas and camera status
Faults and maintenance
Review fault details, site locations and recovery records
Statistics and analysis
Visualize pedestrian-signal extension and voice-guidance records and pedestrian statistics
Site and control-center integration
Configure data and operational interfaces for Smart Crosswalk field devices and the institution’s control environment
Proposed VLM features
Video observations · Situation and environmental context · Reanalysis comparisons
Check evidence for each explanation · Verify time and target conditions · Operator review
Integration with existing functions
Site and device management → Video and events → VLM situation analysis → LLM evidence review → Operator checks → Action and statistics records
Source: 2026 Company Profile, pages 11·13·14
Detailed models, installation requirements, integration scope and acceptance criteria are finalized through project review and approved specifications.
The integration scope for signal controllers, guidance devices and control centers is designed for the site configuration.
Site information
Device status · Site information · Situation events
Operational tasks
Status checks · Fault review · Action records
Analysis tasks
Compare operational statistics and service records
BEFORE YOU START
Common questions before implementation.
How do VLM/LLM features integrate with existing cEMS functions?
The proposed configuration builds on site and device management, video and events, faults and maintenance, and operational statistics. Video and site information for the selected event inform VLM analysis; LLM evidence review and operator checks link to that event’s action and review records. Data and functional scope are finalized for the implementation requirements.
What roles do a VLM and an LLM play in cEMS?
In the proposed cEMS analysis and review workflow, a VLM refines situation explanations using video and site information, while an LLM compares the explanation with relevant evidence. Device status and event records are reviewed together.
What evidence is used to review analysis results?
Review video and site records linked to key explanations alongside the applicable time and target. Insufficient or conflicting evidence remains an item for further checking. A single video frame does not establish an accident cause or signal violation.
Is the same information available at every site?
The availability of signal records, environmental information, before-and-after video and device status varies by site. Available material and its applicable time and target determine the feature configuration.
How does it connect to an existing control center?
We review the site communications network and control-center integration protocols, then agree on data-processing requirements for status, events and images. Integration scope and test conditions are defined before supporting the connection.
Are the camera and management software the same product?
The AI camera detects site conditions; cEMS is software that manages the status and records of connected sites.
Tell us about the application environment and existing equipment so we can review the configuration you need.
